Archive for December, 2007

Changing the Title of the Blog

Sunday, December 30th, 2007

By now those of you who have been reading some of my posts have noticed that the emphasis has shifted to commentary about the War in Iraq.   It has become clearer over time that there are innumerable parallels between the Vietnam and Iraq Wars.  My process in seeing the very disturbing connections has been greatly furthered by the Marilyn Young/Lloyd Gardner edited book IRAQ AND VIETNAM: HOW NOT TO LEARN FROM THE PAST, which is essential reading in my estimation, even for those of us who are doing our best to keep abreast of developments on the many fronts of this current debacle in Iraq.  Whether the subject be the policy of torture, which had some of its roots in Vietnam era practices, or the endless misinformation fed to us by a government that has consistently overstepped its limits, which was so often true during Vietnam, this book gives context and many backstories of which we need to be aware to truly appreciate how much has not been learned.

So there is a new title – IRAQ & VIETNAM WAR STORIES – and a new address: www.iraqandvietnamwarstories.com/blog

I hope this site will continue to offer worthwhile information and that you are encouraged to respond.  I have also changed the Title Page to better delineate the blog’s purpose, so if you are so inclined please check it out to see what is different in the way the site is being presented.

May the New Year bring with it changes in how our country conducts itself in the world so that we can feel less alienated and more engaged in the work of peace, not war-making.

RECRUITMENT ISSUES ABOUND – WHAT WILL HAPPEN IN ‘08??? IS A DRAFT THE ANSWER?

Saturday, December 22nd, 2007

    Barely able to meet recruitment goals in ‘07 despite lowering standards, offering bonuses and accepting heretofore unfit men and women to serve, the military faces ‘08 with enormous uncertainty.  Is this a positive development or a tragic one compounding the unremitting tragedy that is the Iraq War?  NPR has been covering the recruitment story for quite some time.  Their latest story is entitled, “THE ARMY FACES TOUGHER RECRUITMENT IN ‘08″ and their website – http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=17551758 – includes this introduction:

The U.S. Army met its recruiting goals for fiscal year 2007, but had to pay recruiting bonuses and lower its standards.         The Army also dipped into recruits from its Delayed Entry Program. It faces an even tougher challenge in 2008 as it         seeks to expand enlistment.

The Army has been offering recruits bonuses of up to $20,000. It also brought in more recruits without high school         diplomas, who scored low on aptitude tests, and who had to get waivers for criminal offenses. Many defense analysts         say this policy is lowering the military’s standards, but the Army rejects that claim.

The Army acknowledges that these measures have made their recruitment job more difficult for 2008. They’ll likely         have to accept more recruits without diplomas and hand out more waivers for criminal records.

In the meantime, the Army is losing captains at an alarming rate due, in part, to extended deployments in Iraq.

There are several other articles worth listening to on this subject, also available at the website above, including ones entitled:

New Boot Camp Takes ‘Gentler’ Approach
Nearly 5,000 Soldiers Deserted Army in 2007
Older Recruits Seek to Prove Their Fighting Form
Army Recruiting Continues on Downward Trend
Army Specialist in Recruitment Ad Killed in Iraq
Army Recruitment in May Expected to Fall Short
Iraq War, Parents and U.S. Army Recruitment

Each article dramatizes the gap, for a wide variety of reasons, between the forces the military requires and the numbers they are succeeding in persuading.  The question is thus begged: Given how long this disastrous war is destined to continue, how will our government meet the demands for manpower it requires?  Is a draft inevitable or will there keep being ways to bring men and women to recruiting offices regardless of the effects on the military’s capacity to wage this ill-begotten war?  Of course, I would greatly appreciate the thoughts of others on these and related subjects.  As we approach the beginning of the final year of this horrific administration, it becomes ever clearer that one of its most lasting and utterly disturbing legacies will be the need for far too many soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan (recent articles have been indicating that the far too gradual reduction of troops in Iraq may very well be accompanied by an increase in forces in the other war we hear so little about) indefinitely.  Where will these men and women be found?

VETSTAGE – A PLACE FOR VETS TO PERFORM AND HEAL – ON NPR

Sunday, December 9th, 2007

While driving to visit my son, Caleb, in Lawrence yesterday morning I was fortunate to be listening to NPR’s “Weekend Edition” when a story was aired about an Iraq War veteran, Sean Huze, who had enlisted in the Marines on 9/12/01, served in Iraq and came back traumatized and needing a way to heal.  He wrote an extraordinary sounding one man show that allowed him to begin the healing process by expressing the horrors he had witnessed and participated in, but he also received death threats on the phone from those who do not want to know what is happening in Iraq.  He proceeded to create a theater company, VETSTAGE, with the assistance of the co-writer of the film, “Crash”, Robert Moresco and then to write a second play, entitled “Wolf”, which opened in the theater space they managed to secure.  Without revealing more of the quite remarkable saga, I am recommending that you go the website for NPR and, if you so choose, that you listen to the interview with Mr. Huze.  The company is composed of veterans, men and women, from the last several wars, including Vietnam vets, though they are primarily Afghanistan and Iraq War vets who are using the experience of acting to face their demons, much like the men who were depicted in “No Unwounded Soldiers” used drama therapy to heal.  The website is http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=17044212

A MORAL DILEMMA – PACIFISM OR WAR – FACED BY A WORLD WAR II VETERAN

Saturday, December 8th, 2007

    I received the memoir that follows from a dear friend and World War II veteran, Hal Stubbs, who wanted to express his thoughts and feelings about a challenging time in his life that he feels resonates with our times, and yet also differs in some important ways. While editing it for him, I learned much about his life and times as well as about another very turbulent period in American history. I was especially struck by the student activism of the ‘30’s that I knew little about. I have included some parenthetical information about organizations and individuals who I believe it helps to know about in order to more fully appreciate the context of Hal’s experience. Hal and I would greatly appreciate any reactions this produces in terms of its relevance, the similarities and differences between then and now and any other thoughts triggered. Here’s Hal’s story:

I became very interested in pacifism and socialism when I started junior high school in Scarsdale, N.Y. at the beginning of the Depression Several stimuli helped propel me towards these ways of seeing the world, though I can’t say exactly which were the most important. In terms of pacifism there was a young Associate Rector, Harry Price, who today we would call an activist and there was a visiting speaker on disarmament whom he brought to our young peoples’ group. With socialism there was the experience of hearing Norman Thomas speak on the radio. Meanwhile, on the home front, my parents were staunchly conservative Wasp Republicans and my brother, two years older, caught some liberal idealism from me, I think, rather than vice versa.

As I reflect on the origins of my interests, there were other experiences I recall that occurred even earlier in my life. As kids in the 1920’s we had often seen World War I amputees and a couple of our Boy Scout leaders were vets with tough stories. We watched World War I movies like “All Quiet on the Western Front” and for a long time we assumed that a war like the one depicted in the film was a horrible thing that could not possibly happen again.

At Scarsdale High School in the early 30’s I became part of a small group of pacifists-socialists in a club called The Forum. We tried to plan a big anti-war event with the aforementioned Mr. Price as one of the speakers, but we were told that we couldn’t get permission unless we agreed to have the American Legion also provide a speaker. At some point in my own personal evolution during high school, I signed the Oxford Pledge to never fight in any war (A group of Oxford University students in Britain took what came to be known as the Oxford Pledge never to bear arms. Those who signed the American version of the Oxford Pledge stated they would refuse to go to war even if their governments drafted them and sought to send them to war). At the same time there were deeply troubling signs from Germany under Hitler and Italy under Mussolini including invasions of the Sudetenland and Ethiopia respectively.

In my freshman year at Harvard in the fall o f ’35. everything became very real. I’m not sure of the exact sequence of events since this is over 70 years ago now, but I think the Veterans of Future Wars meeting came first. A man named Lewis Gorin had published a popular satirical book called “Patriotism Prepaid”, arguing that bonuses should be paid to young men in advance of their military service in future wars, since otherwise many deserving servicemen would not live to enjoy the bonus. (how ironic that this is precisely what our current government is doing to entice men and women to join the military during the Iraq War). For this purpose he had organized the V.F.W. with F. now standing for Future. This was partly an anti-war pitch and partly a satire on the World War I veterans who had recently marched on Washington and camped on the Capitol grounds demanding a bonus and civil service preferences some 20 years after their service, since the country was mired in a Depression with a soaring jobless rate. Some Harvard students took up the idea and called a meeting to form a local chapter of V.F.W. They handed out membership certificates and lapel buttons, and in a large meeting room filled to overflowing, we sang the anthem they had composed to the tune of the song “Sons of Toil and Danger” from the show “The Vagabond King”. I’ve kept a copy of the words: “Youth who bear war’s onus, Let’s collect the bonus, And return prosperity. . . . . .” It was hilarious fun, but we were well aware that the joke might eventually be on us.

It must have been soon thereafter that many of my friends and I joined the recently formed Harvard Student Union (HSU), which voted to affiliate with Joe Lash’s American Student Union (ASU) (Lash, born to Russian-Jewish emigre parents on December 9, 1909 in New York City’s Upper West Side, would ultimately become one of the most important student leaders of the Depression era, as well as a respected journalist and biographer. As a student at the City College of New York, Lash began to write left-wing opinion pieces for the campus newspaper and chaired the college’s socialist organization, gaining a reputation as a young radical whose views only grew more committed in the wake of the Great Depression. Indeed, through much of that time period Lash was vocally committed to a socialist revolution in the United States and he actively campaigned for abolition of mandatory military training. He became a leader in the Student League for Industrial Democracy, founded the Association of Unemployed College Alumni, and served as an officer in the American Student Union. Perhaps most notably, however, Lash was responsible for organizing various anti-war demonstrations on college campuses from 1934 to 1941, in which students refused to attend class for an hour). Rolf Kaltenborn, son of H.V., a German-born radio newscaster, had been “Post Commander” of our VFW chapter and was now elected President of HSU. When Rolf graduated, Bob Lane of our class succeeded him and went on to be national president of ASU. Our official platform was for Peace, Civil Liberties, and Social Security. (This was a switch towards the positive from an earlier ineffective group called the National Student League against War and Fascism.)

I’m having trouble recalling any noteworthy events that the HSU staged to promote our agenda. It was nothing like the strikes and sit-ins of the Vietnam era, but mostly “mass meetings” (indoors), posters, leaflets, letters to the press, etc. It was serious business—one member had an older brother already fighting fascism in Spain—but a good part of our energy was expended in arguing among ourselves.

It became clear very early on that a substantial number of our members were also in the Stalinist YCL (Young Communist League), as well as a small minority in a Trotskyite cell. (Trotsky was still alive then, in Mexico.) Most of the time this mixture was comfortable, although there were times when it was annoying to realize that the Communists were trying to bend the HSU to their agenda. I remember one of them claiming that the Red Army was the “biggest force for peace in the world.” For the rest of my 4 years there was uneasy tension between the anti-war and anti-Nazism forces, with the latter gaining most of our attention, and pacifism seeming more like a dream.

A landmark event was the National Convention of ASU at Vassar in 1938, (The modern American Student movement began in the 1930’s, when the National Student League joined with the Student League for Industrial Democracy to form the American Student Union. During its peak years, from spring 1936 to spring 1939, the movement mobilized at least 500,000 college students – about half the American student body – in annual one-hour strikes against war. The movement also organized students on behalf of an extensive reform agenda, which included federal aid to education, government job programs for youth, abolition of the compulsory Reserve Officers’ Training Corps (ROTC), academic freedom, racial equality, and collective bargaining) which several other Harvardians and I attended. By this point, Joe Lash and others were pushing the anti-Nazi platform. When Norman Thomas gave an eloquent plea for the pacifist-socialist position, the standing ovation gained only about 25% participation of the audience.

Three months after we ‘39’ers graduated, Hitler made the deal with Stalin and invaded Poland. My brother and I were spending that Labor Day weekend with a small group of high school friends at the summer home on Shelter Island of the parents of one of the friends, Harry Ballinger. Harry was a popular, outgoing native of London who had arrived in Scarsdale with his family only a few years earlier. Sailing around the island those perfect late-summer days, it was hard for us to believe that our world was falling apart. A staunch British patriot, Harry soon afterwards went up to Canada to enlist in the RCAF (Royal Canadian Air Force), ironically the opposite purpose from those who fled to Canada to avoid the draft during the Vietnam era.

I soon became aware that my few Communist friends were understandably beside themselves, not knowing where to turn when Comrade Joe (Stalin) deserted them. Starting to work as an actuarial clerk in NYC and living at home in Scarsdale, out of regular touch with Harvard classmates (no cell phones or e-mail…), I didn’t know which way to turn either. It had clearly become too late for the war to be stopped, so should I now join America First to help keep the U.S. out of it? But this was the organization of Republican Isolationist Senators Gerald Nye and BurtonWheeler, who were responsible for having kept us out of the League of Nations, thus contributing to its impotence, as well as suspected pro-Nazis like Charles Lindbergh. I did get on their mailing list, but took no active part.

More important for me personally was what would I do about my Oxford Pledge when my draft number came up? I still believed (and still do) that any war is evil, but here it was and there was no stopping it. “Bundles for Britain” sentiment was growing and FDR was clearly nudging us into closer involvement. I had lost my religion and could not claim exemption on that ground. If I just went to jail while all (or nearly all) of my friends were putting their lives on the line, how would I feel after it was over? I really struggled with this, but by the Fall of ’41 I finally decided to use my math-science background to apply for meteorology training in the Army Air Forces. I would be out of direct combat, but at the same time more useful to the “defense” effort than if I were to carry a rifle.

December 7, 1941, of course, brought the end of the use of the word “defense”. My draft number came up in February of ’42 before my meteorology application had been officially approved, so I went through induction at Camp Upton and basic Air Force training at Keesler Field. When the approval of my application came through, I was ordered back from Biloxi to New York University for 9 months of meteorology training, ending with a 2nd Lt. commission. After a few months of forecasting at Mather Field in Calif., I received orders for “overseas” early in ’43. On board an Army transport ship, we steamed out past the Golden Gate in a large convoy, but when all the other ships soon took a right turn to head for the Aleutians, our captain somehow missed the signal, and we continued alone across the Pacific for 21 days, landing in Brisbane. I spent the next two years in the Southwest Pacific, mostly forecasting the weather at 5th Air Force headquarters at three locations in New Guinea, then three more years in the Philippines.

This turned out to work better for me personally than I could have hoped. I did have a couple of bouts with malaria, but logged about 100 hours on flights (mostly reconnaissance) in war zones without being shot at, and the experience was great for my self -esteem. The final good fortune for me came at the horrible expense of the residents of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. I had come back to the U.S. in May ’45 (by plane, hearing the V-E Day news at an island stop en route) with a deal to take a 10-week refresher course in meteorology (with other weather officers from various theaters of war) at Chanute Field in Illinois, then have leave at home for the month of August, and then return to Clark Field in Luzon. When the war ended in mid-August, my orders were changed to report to Fort Dix for optional reassignment or discharge. Terminal Leave also led to my engagement and November marriage to Lu, my wonderful wife of 62 years now, which almost certainly would never have happened if I had returned to the Far East for another year or so.

I had succeeded in obtaining a relatively safe assignment. Of the few die-hard pacifists in HSU, I know of only one who, I heard later, had chosen to spend the war in prison, but I have a related story with a tragic-ironic twist. Don Barker, a good friend from Scarsdale High and my brother’s roommate at Harvard, was politically conservative, an athlete and a star on the swim team. He took Air Force flight training, flew scores of transport missions in North Africa and came home without a scratch. His younger brother, Bob, was at Amherst College when the draft started, and (as Don told me bitterly on a post-war tennis court) under the influence of a strong anti-war professor, Bob chose to declare conscientious objection status, which he was subsequently granted. He was assigned to participate as a guinea pig in some kind of experimental testing of food or weapons for the Army from which he got sick and died.

I was much more fortunate.. There were no casualties among my family or relatives, but my wife still remembers sitting down to a large family New Year’s Day dinner (in ’43 or ’44) when the doorbell rang. It was a messenger bringing news that her cousin had been killed in action in North Africa. There were, of course, a good many of my Scarsdale and Harvard classmates who failed to survive the war, but just three or four who were close friends. One of these was our Shelter Island host Harry Ballinger, the RCAF bombardier, who went down in the North Sea returning from a mission over Germany.

When I reflect back on these difficult times, I have many mixed feelings: sadness for the great guys who gave their lives while still so young and for their families at that time (though this feeling is much less acute now than it was then); frustration in thinking about the time and energy spent on activism to no avail; and despair at how the human race can keep making the same mistakes.
As for my choices and decisions when I was confronted by the draft, I think I made the only decision that made sense. If I had to do it over again, I would do the same….

Army Captains Critique Iraq War

Sunday, December 2nd, 2007

I have heard from several sources that the surge in U.S. troops that the Bush administration has undertaken is being sold to us as a significant success in quelling resistance and stabilizing conditions on the ground in Iraq.  I have known that there is a great likelihood of a gap between what is being told to us by media and political pundits and what is really happening, so I was very pleased when  I heard the report I am sending out in this post.  It tells the story from the point of view of 12 men and women who are doing our dirty work.  These captains went into the service with a commitment to serving their country and after their time of service each sees great inadequacies in the conduct of this war.  “Tactical successes cannot take the place of strategic successes”, as one of the captains, Luis Montalvan, points out in the piece.   He and his fellow captains, “believe that current American strategy is simply arming and training Sunni and Shite militias for a future civil war”.  Another of the captains, Elizabeth Bostwick alluded to the possibility of a draft since she thinks our citizens are not taking this war seriously.  Jason Blindauer takes it a step further and “quotes German military philosopher Carl von Clausewitz, saying a country has to have both the strength of means and the strength of will to win a war.” I have excerpted part of the full story heard on NPR  earlier this week, all of which is available at this website: (http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=16686541&sc=emaf) and if you want to hear the rest you can check out this website and hit the LISTEN NOW option.

Army Captains Critique Iraq War


Correction: Versions of this story heard on air incorrectly characterized Luis Montalvan’s parents. Both were born in the United States. The archived audio has been edited to remove the error.

 

“Enough of this bumper-sticker patriotism. Do something about it or stop wasting my time.”

Elizabeth Bostwick, ex-U.S. Army captain

 

 

 

 

 

Morning Edition, November 28, 2007 · A dozen former U.S. Army captains wrote a column for The Washington Post last month entitled “The Real Iraq We Knew” in which they set out to describe the war they had experienced, instead of the one generals and politicians had described.

The officers’ words have stirred controversy, with some critics calling them traitors. But that hasn’t stopped them from speaking out.

In the op-ed piece, published on the fifth anniversary of the authorization of military force in Iraq, the 12 captains wrote that they had “seen the corruption and the sectarian division.”

“We understand what it’s like to be stretched too thin. And we know when it’s time to get out,” they said.

“Captain is a unique position in the Army because you are really a cog at the center of it all,” said Jason Blindauer, a veteran of five years in the Army, including three deployments to Iraq. “As we used to say, you can see the asses of the generals and the faces of the privates.”

But a $35,000 retention bonus could not keep these captains in, even though at the outset they had been deeply committed to the military.

“There is no job that I ever wanted to do other than being a military officer,” Blindauer said. “As far as the prospect of going to war with Iraq, I was excited about it. I was a young infantry officer with the opportunity to go to war.”

Jeff Bouldin served in the Army for four years and in Iraq for 14 months. Like most of the 12 captains, he initially supported the invasion, but gradually became disillusioned with the leaders in charge of the war.

“The tactics we used and the overall goals in every province I served in had no semblance to any military logic that I had ever known,” he said.

Then there was the prospect of repeated deployments without much time in between for family.

“I had a young family,” Bouldin said. “I had a son who was 24 months old and I had seen him for four months of his entire life.”

Blindauer and Bouldin are talking in Elizabeth Bostwick’s Dallas apartment. Bostwick spent four years in the Army.

“I believed in my mission and beyond that I tried not to think about it,” Bostwick said.

She said she tried not to think beyond her own security mission with the Military Police. Even though she comes from a military family, she wasn’t gung-ho about the war.

“Knowing that the preponderance of your peer group is home shopping, having stable relationships not interrupted by deployments … it’s disheartening,” Bostwick said. “You’re saying enough of this bumper-sticker patriotism. Do something about it or stop wasting my time.”

To the group of 12, doing something about it means signing up to serve, and they suggest that a draft may be necessary. Jason Blindauer quotes German military philosopher Carl von Clausewitz, saying a country has to have both the strength of means and the strength of will to win a war.

“We don’t have a military large enough to conduct the long-duration, low-intensity wars, and we haven’t harnessed the collective will of the American people. So what good is it?” Blindauer said.

Luis Montalvan, who currently resides in Brooklyn, N.Y., joined the Army when he was 17 and stayed in for 17 years. He did two tours in Iraq. Montalvan angrily disagrees with the many bloggers who say the 12 captains ignore the apparent success of the recent troop surge.

“What has the government of Iraq done? It has done nothing, so it doesn’t matter how many tactical successes you have if you’re not having any strategic successes.”

Montalvan says the 12 have no political agenda; most are independents. The captains believe that current American strategy is simply arming and training Sunni and Shite militias for a future civil war. Montalvan, who worked closely with Iraqis on both his deployments, said he is disgusted with the level of corruption he witnessed. Even worse, he said, is American inaction in the face of it.

“There is still no Iraqi-American anticorruption action plan. This corruption is feeding, sustaining the sectarian divide.”

On his first tour in Iraq in 2003, Montalvan worked on the Iraq-Syrian border with only 40 soldiers trying to watch over a major foreign entry point where corruption ruled. At one point things got nasty.

“Some men tried to assassinate me in December of ‘03 and they nearly succeeded,” he said. “They were wielding knives and hand grenades, and I was injured. One of them was killed and the other was severely wounded but he staggered off.”

Montalvan said he is “not altogether comfortable talking about it.” He says it’s something he’s dealing with and will “probably deal with for sometime.”

Some bloggers have called the 12 cowards and traitors.

“For those people who would rather thump their chests and say that these people don’t know anything or that these people are cowards or anything along those lines, they can go to hell,” he said.

When the interview was over, Montalvan went into his bathroom and got sick. He apologized, saying it may have been side effects of medications he was taking. But his friends said it was more likely the result of reliving painful events in Iraq.